Nitropack vs Wp Rocket: What is the best and cheaper

Last updated on September 28, 2022 | By

Nitropack and Wp Rocket are plugins aiming at WordPress Pagespeed and Core Web Vitals Optimization. What is the best solution for improving your WordPress website speed and who has the best price?

Nitropack’s main difference from Wp Rocket might be its CDN solution, but as Wp Rocket offers RocketCDN for $9/mo, it can be an alternative to Nitropack.

Features and Price comparison

The main difference between Nitropack and Wp Rocket is that Nitropack offers a built-in CDN feature, that stores all your assets on a CDN(Content Delivery Network). Alongside their Script Manager.

Nitropack has a user-friendly interface, which has “optimization levels” allowing you to perform 5 different optimization sets within a single button.

Those pre-configured sets are based on trial and error testing by Nitropack and are defined by how much Nitropack optimizes the website, which may include delaying all javascript, how it’s run the fonts, and other optimization tasks.

The “Strong” and “Ludricous” optimizations levels need advanced testing, as they may change your layout/functionalities.

FunctionalityWp RocketNitropack
Tools to improve Core Web Vitals LCP✔️✔️
Tools to improve Core Web Vitals CLSFilters to Critical CSS and RUCSS
Delay JS until user-interaction✔️✔️
CDN(RocketCDN $9/mo)✔️
Critical CSS✔️✔️
Cloudflare integration✔️✔️
Database Optimization✔️(Advanced Database Cleaner)
Lazyload + Image Optimization + WebP(Imagify $10/mo)✔️
HTML/CSS/JS minification & compression✔️✔️
DNS prefetching, preloading✔️✔️
Remove unused CSS✔️✔️ (Reduce Unused CSS)
Critical CSS✔️✔️

Wp Rocket plus RocketCDN can be a Nitropack alternative. RocketCDN offers unlimited traffic, while Nitropack is limited to a pageviews limit, according to your plan on both products.

The pricing (1 year) on each product would be as follows:

  • Nitropack 5.000 pageviews/mo limit(1GB max bandwidth), 1 year plan: Free*
  • Wp Rocket 1 site $49 + $90 RocketCDN(unlimited bandwidth): $139/year
  • Nitropack 50.000 pageviews/mo limit(25GB max bandwidth): $199/year
  • Wp Rocket 1 site $49 + $90 RocketCDN(unlim. bandwidth) + $100/year Imagify: $239/year
  • Nitropack 200.000 pageviews/mo limit(100GB max bandwidth): $485/year
  • Nitropack 1.000.000 pageviews/mo limit(500GB max bandwidth): $1672/year

Those are approximate figures, each plugin has its features and a different UX approach. *Free users have a NitroPack badge in the footer.

If you haven’t bought Wp Rocket or Nitropack yet, consider using my reflink:

Nitropack and Wp Rocket alternatives

You may also consider the following plugins as a Nitropack or Wp Rocket alternative:

Speed Test and Core Web Vitals Results

Google’s Pagespeed doesn’t check or have a user-interaction feature to give your website a real user testing experience, and because of that, you must ensure you’re passing Core Web Vitals field data.

If you’re passing the lab data with Nitropack using any of their Javascript optimizations, you must also test locally with the Core Vitals extension and/or set up Cloudflare Web Analytics to get field data and certify you’re passing with field data.

With the new 3.9 update of Wp Rocket, the same applies, due to it now delaying all Javascript but not internal javascript files/Jquery/inline scripts.

As for Core Web Vitals field data results, The Core Web Vitals Technology report ranks Nitropack slightly above Wp Rocket on mobile and desktop metrics with a minor margin percentage advantage as of June 2022. It also does have a better median Lighthouse and lower page size (kb) than other plugins.

Nitropack ranks below Wp Rocket on CLS for mobile, even as Nitropack has a built-in CDN. While choosing an option for improving your Core Web Vitals, have in mind that Nitropack may lack features to improve CLS.

image 4
WordPress Caching plugins having good CWV mobile results – June 2022

What is Nitropack and how does it works

Nitropack is a CDN + Cache/Performance plugin solution, also described as an all-in-one speed optimization solution. It stores your entire website assets on the cloud to improve all areas of Pagespeed and has a built-in “script manager”, which delays Javascript based on the selected optimization level.

Nitropack stores your entire assets on the CDN, and it can speed up even the worst of websites, with the power of its script manager, it can offer the highest Pagespeed scores possible. But that comes with a prize, Nitropack may lower your CLS and LCP if you use it incorrectly.

What is Wp Rocket and how does it works

Wp Rocket is an open-source developed plugin. WpRocket has RocketCDN as an option for a CDN service, priced at $8 monthly to speed up all your assets, similarly to Nitropack.

Wp Rocket has strong technical documentation, detailing each of its features with a page including examples, and in some features, it adds issues debugging, with a guide on how to solve the issues. Alongside its strong and immense development community, covering the most edge cases from regular users.

RocketCDN (WP Rocket’s CDN plugin)

RocketCDN is a Wp Rocket CDN product. With a unique price of $8 a month, it offers unlimited CDN traffic(at Wp Rocket’s discretion). It also offers integration with Wp Rocket. Rocket CDN is powered by StackPath which has 45 edge locations around the world.

Consider buying Rocket CDN with our reflink

RocketCDN setup is a simple 1 step task, just activate it after purchase on the Wp Rocket admin panel CDN tab. It also offers integration with Cloudflare.

Nitropack vs Cloudflare

Nitropack and Cloudflare are products with different use cases, but Cloudflare currently offers Nitropack competing products such as WordPress Automatic Platform Optimization, priced at $5/month.

As for Nitropack compatibility with Cloudflare, Nitropack offers built-in integration with Cloudflare proxy at the cache level. Nitropack recognizes if your site is using Cloudflare, and prompts you to the integration config setup.

Get your Core Web Vitals optimized


  1. Thanks for the post. I did find myself wanting more info. I’ve been testing Nitropack and comparing it to a more manual way to get adjustments for speed (caching, minifying, cleaning up server requests.) I found Nitropack to be a solid solution HOWEVER – it really adds up to a lot of money if you have a bunch of small websites. For that reason, I felt that WP Rocket would be a better solution in my case. But I have not tested it and I haven’t seen an article where a direct comparison was made. I will say that with Nitropack, I was able to take our site from 41/85 to 99/100. Excellent results with very few tweeks in the settings.

  2. Nitropack is the best caching solution I have ever used and has built in CDN. No one caching plugin comes close to it. It makes WP-Rocket look amateur and I speak from experience.

    The cost is a bit higher than the competition but totally worth it if your website is profitable. Plus they have a free version too. The support and up time is also excellent.

    If anyone has a better solution than Nitropack please comment below.

  3. I used NitroPack in the past. But I disabled it because of the amount of JS added to the site and conflicts with my theme and styles.

    Yes, the site got faster, but it got buggy and the loading speed was not as significant as expected.

    Probably was just me and not the service, but it didn’t work for me!


Leave a Comment